The Best Handicappers in the World
Click a handicapper to view his upcoming picks and his complete pick history.
Handicappers with a white background are all available as a part of the $49/mo Gold membership.
1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 7Customize Your Search »
| Handicapper | eP | eWP | ROI | Odds | Upcoming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KpeLitE
|
$1,486 | 52.75% | 0.70% | +312 | 706 | 2 Picks » |
LeonBet-ru
|
$5,195 | 53.78% | 2.66% | +227 | 651 | 1 Pick » |
Guillermo
|
$14,597 | 65.52% | 25.08% | +213 | 194 | |
SportsInvestmentSolutions
|
$3,511 | 53.21% | 1.58% | +179 | 743 | |
Butchies Bookie Busters
|
$1,687 | 53.17% | 1.50% | +172 | 375 | |
baha
|
$8,200 | 66.42% | 26.80% | +164 | 102 | 3 Picks » |
Raggededge17
|
-$2,281 | 50.07% | -4.42% | +150 | 172 | 4 Picks » |
10grand
|
-$2,059 | 49.85% | -4.83% | +141 | 142 | 1 Pick » |
godfatherswinners
|
$950 | 52.60% | 0.42% | +137 | 749 | |
The Contrarian
|
-$2,989 | 51.56% | -1.57% | +133 | 635 | 2 Picks » |
carm23
|
-$622 | 51.88% | -0.97% | +129 | 213 | |
Ivan Sports
|
$9,668 | 57.83% | 10.40% | +129 | 310 | 2 Picks » |
lloscatest2
|
$5,773 | 60.45% | 15.39% | +123 | 125 | 2 Picks » |
Slick Lizard
|
$12,590 | 55.45% | 5.86% | +122 | 716 | 1 Pick » |
theoracle
|
$7,718 | 53.28% | 1.72% | +120 | 1,495 | 3 Picks » |
aicnine
|
$10,151 | 58.10% | 10.92% | +117 | 310 | 1 Pick » |
ripnice
|
-$7,757 | 51.61% | -1.47% | +116 | 1,765 | 1 Pick » |
BYRDRACERS
|
$9,527 | 54.78% | 4.58% | +115 | 694 | 1 Pick » |
crazeshoe32
|
$9,194 | 53.13% | 1.43% | +114 | 2,137 | 2 Picks » |
skyler GP
|
-$675 | 51.79% | -1.13% | +113 | 200 |
Free Sports Monitor
Get winning picks from the best sports handicappers in the world. Every handicapper with a white background below is considered an "amateur" handicapper, and every single pick of every single amateur can be seen with the absurdly affordable $49/mo Gold Membership. The handicappers with the yellow background are considered "professional" handicappers. These professionals are in business for themselves, and sell their picks independently from the Line.com Gold Membership. Click on any of these professional handicappers to see how much they are charging for their picks. Note: Line.com does not take a single penny of commission from professional handicapper sales.
Line.com offers a fully transparent sports monitoring service free of charge. While all monitoring services claim to provide accurate results, and maybe some do, it's impossible to know which ones can be trusted and which ones accept bribes for the top ranking spots.
Accountability is what makes Line.com the best, most trusted sports monitor on the net. Not only is every pick publicly viewable just 10 minutes after the start of each game, but our popularity and social nature forces us to maintain the highest ethical standards. Line.com is the most popular sports monitor in the history of the Internet, so there are always thousands of people double-checking every pick made on this site. What's more, we are a very social site where users can communicate with each other and the world through private messages and forum posts, respectively, making it impossible for us to hide.
Who are the world's best sports handicappers? There is no longer a debate. Countless handicapping websites, some of them outright scams, claim to be the best sports bettors on the 'net. But rest assured, if a "handicapper" isn't monitored it's because he is trying to hide something. Monitoring sports picks is incredibly fast and easy with our Fantasy Sportsbook, so don't accept "I don't need to monitor myself" or "I don't have time to monitor my picks" as excuses. I've heard a laundry list of reasons why con-artists don't want to be monitored, but I've never heard a single good reason. The cold hard truth is that these handicapping websites need to lie to you to take your money. Take a stand and stop giving money to scammers! If you've already been scammed, make sure you expose the scammers in our sports betting forum.
Graphs are quite the time saver (you don't really care about someone who had one good month eight months ago and all negative months since), but make sure you know what the graphs represent.
Regardless of the search query, all graphs show OVERALL profit grouped by month for the past 12 months. Because each graph includes a starting data point of 0, the maximum number of data points for each graph is 13 points. 13 points represents 12 months of data, whereas two data points represents one month of data, etc.
Data shown is by Fiscal Month not Calendar Month (eg, on Feb 12th the most recent "month" of data will show Jan 12 - Feb 12 not Feb 1 - Feb 12).
Use graphs as only part of your analysis! All graphs have a relative scale, so comparing two users by graphs alone will not tell you who is more successful. Instead, graphs give you a feel for a handicapper's consistency, downswings, recent trending, etc.
Note that graphs include ALL bets from a user even though the rankings only show full game bets.
The Profit figure shown is actually an adjusted profit calculation. Line.com allows all users to "bet" between $100 and $500 per game. Showing true profit in the rankings would unfairly reward those users who bet $500 on each and every game as compared to those handicappers who correctly use the unit system to weight their bets based on confidence level. Adjusted Profit normalizes each bet to a $300 bet size by dividing the total profit or loss on an individual game by the total amount risked on the game and then multiplying that number by 300. Note that this is NOT the same thing as adjusting EACH play to $300. This method fairly rewards you for using proper bet sizes, and rewards you for doing well on your "best bets."
The ROI figure shown is the per play Return on Investment. ROI = (net amount won / total amount wagered). Note that we could easily make these numbers look way better by using overall ROI - for example, as of 12 Feb 2012 CashMagician has an overall ROI of 424% - but we care more about displaying important statistics than reckless ones.
Barring additional information WIN% is an utterly meaningless statistic. That being said, we know some of you want to see it. To illustrate the uselessness of this statistic on its own, as of 12 Feb 2012 JustFollowMe has a WIN% of 57.69% but has a negative ROI, while on the other hand MrBoxHead has a WIN% of 43.33% but has a positive ROI.
The Odds figure represents the average odds of the users' picks. Some users will have a really high ROI with a relatively low WIN %; this is because of the average odds. For example, as of 12 Feb 2012, BaseWinner has an ROI of 4.72% but a WIN % of only 50.89%. This is made possible because he generally plays underdogs.
The rankings only include bets on full games. We have some handicappers who are very sharp at halftime and quarter bets, but we don't include them in the rankings because they are harder to follow. The default rankings settings may change a lot. We will continually tweak the settings until global happiness is maximized. Doing so will undoubtedly cause some handicappers to feel less important - that's not the case, we're just experimenting.