Novak Djokovic (3) vs Andy Murray (2)
Australian Open 2012 - Melbourne, Australia - ATP Tennis - 1/27/12 3:30AM| ATP - Fri, Jan 27th | Point Spread | Money Line | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201 Novak Djokovic | - | -255 | - |
| 202 Andy Murray | - | +215 | - |
Start a New Topic Page:1 2
| ATP - Fri, Jan 27th | Point Spread | Money Line | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201 Novak Djokovic | - | -255 | - |
| 202 Andy Murray | - | +215 | - |
They are playing the french open right now.
lol fuck tennis
Thanked by
* I got in at -225 and would probably still take it at this line but not too much higher.
Murray has always been a slow starter and prone to giving away points in easier matches. It's true that Andy has a great record against lower ranked players though. If you've been watching this major event and you don't think Murray has developed new weapons and is playing his best Tennis yet, I could never agree with you. Murray has never ripped the forehand back cross court as well as he is now. This will hopefully surprise Djok and get Murray more drop shot opportunities to tire him out. I'd say the over games for the first set is the most promising, but still sticking with Murray ML. Nadal in the final may be a tougher test but I'm expecting a Murray v. Nadal final.
The mainstream thought is that Murray fails in these matches. But in fairness he loses major finals to better ranked and better skilled players like Fed (who he has a better record against), Nadal and Novak. He is nowhere near a Tim Henman yet, the fact they are both English is the reason behind the whole Murray major jinx theory. It's absurd, the guy is on his way up not down. After the whole go back to England and deal with the girlfriend stupidity, Murray finally decided to make Tennis his life and hire Lendl. Murray is the best all around player in the game. Best return of serve (minus maybe Ferrer), though Djok has improved in that regard. Murray's cross court backhand and on the run drop shot is second to none. The guy is phenomenal and he's not long overdue for a major like everyone thinks. He will take the #3 spot soon after this open.
Stats dont always tell the whole story but Joker was #1 last year winning 39% of return games with Murray in second at 36%.
break points converted : Joker - 48 % Murray - 46%
all these stats are even more impressive since with Joker's success last year he played far more matches against top 10 opposition.
As I said before Tennis is all about playing the big points, as Clijsters proved before getting knocked out. Take Nadal, he plays every point as hard as he possibly can (sort of). Djokovic is also a very hard worker and will rip a winner on a scrub for 3 straight sets to go 60 every time. Murray is the most laxidazical of the top 10 players. He doesn't play every point equally, only hitting top gear in the big points versus the big competition. His traditional way doesn't help him hit top form very fast, but it's smart in the sense he keeps his weapons hidden from the big opponents until the time comes. This is why he's such a slow starter but still gets deep into the major events. I think this is gonna prove favorable for him especially in the second set, where I expect to see Murray do well on break points on both sides. By that time his weapons should be loosened and catch Novak by surprise. A lot of people love Andy and others hate him for his laid back style. He is also a whiner. I'd like to hear if you think Murray's "hidden weapons" for the big moments will sway any specific numbers for this match. Gonna be a good one I think 5 sets.
Also Maybe I am wrong, but I believe Murray to have a loser's mentality which puts him behind before they even step on the court. Can a new coach change that? Maybe but I dont like to Gamble on possible effects of a coach that I cannot be sure of when there are so many tennis-related variables.
Thanked by
Murray will whine I think just mildly. He can't look up at Lendl out of respect so this will change how he jumps back into every point even if it is a placebo. He won't be Sharapova that's for sure. None of that stuff may effect the outcome. I am liking the "he's ready" slightly chance approach but also I don't see how he can be intimadted anymore after making Djokovic retire two straight matches.
Are we at game time yet and why isn't the line jumping around? This should be a big one.